Which of the following best describes an audience's response to an effective reductio ad absurdum?

An effective reductio ad absurdum is a form of argument that seeks to demonstrate that a position leads to absurd or contradictory outcomes, thereby highlighting the flaws in that position. When an audience responds positively to such an argument, they are prompted to reconsider their stance on the issue. This is because the argument challenges their existing beliefs by illustrating the unreasonable consequences of those beliefs, encouraging them to analyze their own thoughts and possibly shift their perspective.

In this way, the audience is not simply confronted with a counterargument, but rather engaged in a deeper thought process that questions the validity of their original position. This method can lead to increased openness to alternative viewpoints and foster critical thinking, making it a powerful tool in advocacy and debate.