Which conclusion type focuses on what ought to be done based on the argument presented?

The conclusion type that focuses on what ought to be done based on the argument presented is referred to as policy. This kind of conclusion advocates specific actions or changes that should be implemented in response to the issues outlined in the argument. For example, in a debate about environmental regulations, a policy conclusion might suggest new laws to protect natural resources based on the evidence presented in the argument.

In contrast, a fact conclusion would focus on establishing whether something is true or false, a value conclusion would assess the worth or morality of something, and an assumption conclusion involves the underlying beliefs that support an argument without necessarily proposing an action. Therefore, understanding that policy conclusions catalyze action is crucial for effective advocacy and debate.