What type of statement would not allow for alternate interpretations of a group's qualities?

A universal negative statement is characterized by its absolute nature, asserting that no members of a specific group possess a certain quality. For example, saying "No mammals are reptiles" leaves no room for ambiguity or alternative interpretations regarding the connection between the two categories. The statement categorically denies any overlap or shared attributes between the group of mammals and reptiles, making it definitive and clear.

In contrast, the other types of statements allow for varying degrees of interpretation. A particular affirmative statement might acknowledge some members of a group possessing a quality while others do not, opening the door to alternative viewpoints. A particular negative statement suggests that some members lack a quality, but does not rule out that others within the group may possess it. Lastly, a convertible statement indicates a relationship that can be reversed, suggesting that the qualities are interchangeable, further allowing for diverse interpretations.

By asserting a complete exclusion without room for exceptions, the universal negative statement restricts interpretation purely to its claim.