What type of argumentation typically contains categorical statements?

Categorical statements are characteristically associated with logical arguments. These statements assert that something belongs to a specific category, using a structure that often employs universal quantifiers such as "all," "none," or "some." In logical argumentation, these categorical statements serve as premises that lead to conclusions based on logical reasoning and deductive structures.

For example, if one were to assert "All humans are mortal" as a categorical statement, it becomes the basis for further logical claims, such as "Since Socrates is a human, he is mortal." This form of reasoning is foundational in formal logic and is used extensively in constructing syllogisms, which are forms of deductive reasoning involving multiple categorical statements leading to a logical conclusion.

In contrast, persuasive arguments focus on convincing an audience through emotional appeal and may not rely strictly on categorical logic. Empirical arguments are based on observation and evidence rather than strict logical reasoning. Exaggerated arguments often employ hyperbole or overstated claims to sway opinion without the rigorous structure seen in logical arguments. Thus, the emphasis on categorical statements aligns closely with the characteristics that define logical arguments.