What type of analogy insists on similar treatment for similar instances?

The type of analogy that insists on similar treatment for similar instances is the judicial analogy. This approach is grounded in the principles of law and fairness, where decisions made in one case should be applied consistently to other similar cases to ensure justice. Judicial analogies draw parallels between previous cases and current situations, arguing that if two situations share relevant characteristics, they should be treated in a similar manner under the law. This promotes consistency in legal rulings and helps to establish precedents that guide future cases.

This choice reflects a fundamental aspect of legal reasoning, where the application of the law should be uniform in analogous situations to maintain equality and fairness in judicial processes. Other options represent different concepts that do not specifically focus on this principle of treating similar cases alike in a legal context.