What is a common example of reductio ad absurdum?

The rationale behind selecting the first choice is grounded in the essence of reductio ad absurdum, which is a form of argument that seeks to demonstrate the falsity of a proposition by illustrating that its logical conclusion leads to an absurd or impractical outcome. By arguing that if everyone engaged in a particular action, it would result in an outrageous scenario, this approach effectively shows the potential flaws or logical inconsistencies in the initial proposition.

This form of argumentation is particularly effective in debates and persuasive writing, as it challenges the audience to consider the implications of extreme cases and encourages them to reassess the validity of the original claim. By highlighting how a certain action could lead to ridiculous consequences when applied universally, the advocate successfully undermines the original argument's credibility, driving home the point that not all proposed actions are sensible or desirable.

In contrast, the other choices focus on different argumentative techniques that do not encapsulate the reductio ad absurdum approach. Using expert opinions is a method to add credibility rather than demonstrating absurdity. Citing statistical evidence serves to quantify arguments but does not push them to an absurd conclusion. Relying on anecdotal evidence evokes emotional responses without addressing logical fallacies or the broader implications of an argument.