What connects the reasons to the conclusion in a categorical argument?

In a categorical argument, the end terms refer specifically to the terms that are the subject and predicate of the conclusion. These terms are essential as they represent the two categories being compared or related through the argument. The connection made by these end terms is what supports the overall conclusion of the argument, as they encapsulate the main claim being made.

The end terms function as the anchors of the argument, allowing the reasons (or premises) to effectively lead to the conclusion. They establish the framework within which the relationship is analyzed, ensuring that the logical inference is drawn appropriately from the premises provided. By clearly identifying these end terms, one can analyze the validity of the reasoning presented in the argument.

The other terms mentioned, such as the middle term, predicate term, and subject term, serve specific roles within the structure of a categorical syllogism but do not function to connect the reasons to the conclusion in the way that the end terms do. Instead, these other terms are involved in forming the categories and relationships that ultimately support the conclusion derived from the end terms.